Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Buddy, Can You Spare $119,000

Category: Minnesota Politics
Posted: 04/20/05 18:05

by Dave Mindeman

I am getting used to the little tricks of our glorious Minnesota speaker, but I think we are witnessing a real "sewer sucker" this time.

At long last, we are close to raising the minimum wage in Minnesota. Although the vote would be close, it looks like a floor vote on raising the minimum wage could pass the House in Minnesota. It would easily pass the Senate and the Governor has indicated he would sign a "reasonable" bill.

One person stands in the way. The Speaker of the House. The champion of all that is corporate.

It seems that one of Sviggum's partners in "circus" tactics, Rep. Jim Knoblauch asked for a "fiscal" note on this bill. A simple procedure that would determine what passage of the bill would actually cost the state. The bill itself doesn't appropriate any money on its own, but there would be $119,000 in costs to the Dept. of Labor to "print and mail new workplace posters outlining the new wage and the law that governs it". Hmmmm... $119,000 in a fiscal budget of $15 billion. At first glance that doesn't sound like much -- after all how much does it cost the state to print up all those worthless bills that never get out of committee?

But wait! The Speaker says that extra cost changes the bill... we have to send it back to committee!!! Knowing full well sending it back to committee will, for all practical purposes, kill the bill.

You know, for 7 years minimum wage has been stuck at $5.15. How many people can live on $5.15 an hour? It is ridiculous. You take a job for minimum wage you are guaranteed to live your life in perpetual debt.

But let's put this in perspective. The Speaker thinks $119,000 is a burden for the state to carry. Let's see... if a minimum wage worker donated all of his salary to the state to cover that $119,000, it would take him 11 years and 5 weeks to pay it off. Yes, Mr. Speaker that is a lot of money to a minimum wage worker. But then, let's talk to Dr. William McGuire, the CEO of UnitedHealth Group. Maybe he could remedy this problem for us. Maybe Dr. McGuire could donate a portion of his salary to help the State of Minnesota give a raise to its minimum wagers. Hmmm, let's see, based on his 2004 reported earnings, he would have to donate a total of 2 hours and 10 minutes of his work day to pay that bill. Whew! Thank heavens he won't have to miss lunch!

C'mon Steve, old boy, give the little guy a break!
comments (0) permalink

The Military Industrial Complex -- Alive and Well

Category: US Politics
Posted: 04/19/05 13:30, Edited: 04/19/05 22:05

by Paul Bartlett

Under GOP tutelage, congressional approval of Bush's Mideast $82 billion war budget, and continued American hegemony throughout the Mideast, is fait accompli. With his war budget spouting a gusher of red ink, it is vital that we recall our thirty fourth president's farewell address to the nation.

On January 17, 1961, President Dwight David Eisenhower delivered a moving and insightful speech to the American people, warning us of the danger posed by the emerging military-industrial complex. Ike's caution included, "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."

Ike served as Supreme Commander during the WWII European campaign and then as Republican president. He was certainly not a dove. As a warrior and a leader, Ike "walked the talk". If he were alive today, Ike would be horrified by Bush's coziness with behemoths like Halliburton and the pro-war zeal of the Bush hawks .

Ike was speaking about hubris, arrogance and the abuse of power. While I am not hopeful, I pray that Bush is capable of historic perspective, and that his team of zealous hawks fully consider Ike's wise admonishments. If this nation continues on its current course, we will collide with the future that Eisenhower feared.
comments (0) permalink

Fonda vs. Lindbergh

Category: US Politics
Posted: 04/19/05 08:51, Edited: 04/20/05 12:02

by Paul Bartlett

Jane Fonda's recent appearance at the Pantages Theater has caused quite a stir amongst the right-wingers who dominate AM talk radio. As a young and enthusiastic anti-war activist, Fonda foolishly visited North Vietnam. She has spent the past four decades apologizing for that lapse.

Now, let's juxtapose that with the actions of local aviation hero, Charles Lindbergh. Lindbergh was an anti-Semite and unabashed Nazi admirer, visiting the devil's heartland several times in the 1930's while living in England. In 1938, Field Marshal Herman Goering awarded Lindbergh the prized German Eagle Service Cross. It was a personal gift from Hitler.

Fonda has been vilified for her trip to North Vietnam. Lindbergh rubbed shoulders with the devil and an airport terminal was named in his honor. Fonda opposed war while Lindbergh admired the Nazi's war prowess. Fonda has been mercilessly condemned while Lindbergh has been adulated. Many Americans will never forgive Fonda; most Americans are unaware or unconcerned that Lindbergh supported the most profound evil of modern history.

The United States lost far more lives during the W.W.II European campaign than during Vietnam. Why have Fonda's critics been mute on the aid and comfort provided by Lindbergh to the Nazis? Who committed the greater treason? I make no excuses for Fonda's actions, but there is something profoundly wrong with this picture.

comments (0) permalink


« August 2018 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

Latest posts


(one year)




RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.